Single moms and family feeling

Pic and article can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/magazine/01Moms-t.html?pagewanted=1&em

In '2 Kids + 0 Husbands = Family,' (published in The New York Times, Jan 29, 2009), Emily Bazelon provides an in-depth report on single motherhood. It's an interesting exploration of the lifestyle of a group of single mothers by choice in Moorestown and Princeton, New Jersey, which left me thinking about the concept of family within and across cultures.

These women have chosen to devote their lives to raising their children. After having or adopting their first child, rather than looking for a father, they chose to have a second one . As such their family feeling was complete. The vast majority of these women have forgone any chance of dating, and focus their energy and time on their children. The extensive report leaves the reader with the feeling that there's no difference between their life and that of any other traditional mom-dad families. Their joys and tribulations are similar and their dedication to their children as unwavering.

I came across this article in the top 10 most popular list of the newspaper online which is an indication of the interest among readers, whom I assume to be mostly Americans. Also, probably most people would have a sympathetic reaction and would find the type of family presented in it just one more respectable choice of lifestyle. It is at this point where I can't help thinking of how readers would react to it here in provincial Tucumán, Argentina. Heavily influenced by the Catholic church, Tucumanians mostly embrace a view of family consisting of the traditional mom-dad-children type. But this is not the problem, as anyone may share that value and still be open and approving of the type of family structure presented by Ms. Bazelon. I wonder how wrong I may be if I bluntly state that most people here would disapprove of Fran, Anne-Marie and their other mom friends. If not strongly against them, or hardly at the point of condemning their choice, they would say they respect them but would certainly have varying degrees of reservation - i.e. disapproval!

Even when I don't count on scientific confirmation by any specialist like the NYTimes reporter does, I'm pretty sure that we have a growing population of single mothers here. The only difference is that though they are supposedly socially accepted, there is still a certain level of covert stigmatization and prejudice against them. According to the church, they would be 'in constant sin' and would be no role models for anyone, let alone their own kids. Out of the church, they do carry on with their life, and are largely not openly chastised. However, when it comes to finding a better job or getting a promotion, or competing for positions of power and influence, you are not likely to find a single mom among the successful candidates. They do reach a certain level of dignified existence, but they are supposed to assume their status and lower their expectations in the professional arena. The worst part is that the chauvinistic portion of men usually see them as an easy target for uncommitted touch-and-go relationships.

The report objectively describes the routine, the pleasures and limitations that these mothers encounter daily. However, the general impression the reader gets is that theirs is just one more choice of lifestyle that deserves as much respect and admiration as any other adult who is committed to the happiness and fulfilment of other human beings. What I'm saying may be so basic to the ears of any reader from other places, but it is unfortunately the picture in my hometown which I've found worth observing and commenting on. What do you think?